The Bank of Canada and Globe and Mail justify their argument using emotionally based ideological attacks disguised as logic. One of their key points boils down to the vilification of men, with the Bank of Canada stating that ownership of Bitcoin is “concentrated among young, educated men with high household income and low financial literacy…”
Now in further development on Poilievre’s position on CBDCs, this morning he publicly stated in a press release and on social media post that he will be seeking to both audit the printing of currency by the Bank of Canada as well as outright ban the Central Bank implementing a CBDC.
The current trendy propagandist push against Bitcoin is that it is bad for the environment, an attack line perfect for an organization like the World Economic Forum. The reality is that Bitcoin mining can actually be good for the environment, but truth has never been a strong priority of the Green Movement.
Dr. Lewis countered Solomon’s absurd assertion of wrongdoing, pointing out that Solomon knows he is pushing a falsehood, seeing as not one person associated with the convoy protest has been charged with the crime of sedition.
Word has come out from a source inside twitter that their board is meeting today and prepared to accept Elon Musk’s offer to buy the company for $43 billion or $54.20 per share.
It almost goes without saying that some of these cryptocurrencies/NFTs are so unstable in value that The Bahamas government must obviously want payment in the most stable and secure cryptocurrency, which is Bitcoin.
A great way to think of this new system is by comparing Canada and China. In China they have a Digital Yuan tied to a social credit system, in Canada, it could very well be a CBDC tied to your ESG score.
It was good to see Dr. Lewis hold her ground against the legacy media and push back while also retaining the softly-spoken demeanor she is known for. She definitely made a splash by fully rejecting the premise of Vassy Kapelos while not being over-combative in her explanation of why the narrative Kapelos was trying to push was deeply flawed.
Trying to ban and confiscate guns is not just anti-freedom due to the direct undermining of property rights and the right to self-defence, but it more fundamentally is a way of disarming the minds of Canadians.
Poilievre is different in the fact that he actually takes time to define the problems he is talking about. He will go on a five-minute rant about the problems causing the inflated housing market and has the power to make a crowd actually listen as he breaks down an issue and the forces at work that create it.
[…] National Telegraph […]