This is why Poilievre’s real score on Charest was his record working for Huawei, a company deeply connected to the Chinese Communist Party. Charest took a paycheck from Huawei at the same time that the CCP took the two Micheals hostage. This was what Poilievre went after him for by simply asking how much he got paid while making a scene of him trying to dodge the question.
Although there is a lot of crossover between those who support Dr. Lewis and Poilievre, it was important at this debate for Lewis to decisively differentiate herself, and she did that on both the Freedom Convoy and social issues.
In the most recent federal election, Jim Karahalios openly backed the PPC, it would be smart for the PPC to do the same. The gain for New Blue is that they would get a good swell of support from the anti-establishment crowd and put to bed the fighting between the new right-wing parties.
This is a significant achievement, not only because the New Blue Party had to develop party infrastructure and EDAs at the same time the recruitment process was started to find candidates, but also because it was all done democratically. If a riding had more than one person wanting to run for the New Blue Party their local EDA had an election, as required by their party constitution, which happened in many ridings across Ontario.
In an email put out to Conservative Party members Haldimand—Norfolk MP and leadership candidate Dr. Leslyn Lewis gave a detailed explanation for her opposition to Digital ID as well as the World Economic Forum (WEF) which promotes Digital ID and other policies that centralizes government power.
When I asked Pierre Poilievre directly, considering all the evidence surrounding the PS752 case, would he reject the notion it was a “systems failure”, but instead a willful act of terrorism committed by the IRGC he agreed stating that “the evidence points to a willful act of terrorism by the IRGC”.
If someone did assault a police officer they definitely should be arrested, but there is heavy skepticism of whether or not an assault, or any crime for that manner, actually happened as the police have been the ones clearly acting more aggressively on the ground during Rolling Thunder.
The Bank of Canada and Globe and Mail justify their argument using emotionally based ideological attacks disguised as logic. One of their key points boils down to the vilification of men, with the Bank of Canada stating that ownership of Bitcoin is “concentrated among young, educated men with high household income and low financial literacy…”
Now in further development on Poilievre’s position on CBDCs, this morning he publicly stated in a press release and on social media post that he will be seeking to both audit the printing of currency by the Bank of Canada as well as outright ban the Central Bank implementing a CBDC.
The current trendy propagandist push against Bitcoin is that it is bad for the environment, an attack line perfect for an organization like the World Economic Forum. The reality is that Bitcoin mining can actually be good for the environment, but truth has never been a strong priority of the Green Movement.
A well written report. Thanks for your effort. It raises awareness.
[…] National Telegraph […]
March 5, 2025
February 19, 2025
Read more
[…] National Telegraph […]