Fortifying The 2024 US Election

Written By B.J. Dichter, Posted on September 27, 2024

How Can 100% of Ballots Favor One Candidate if the Nation Is Divided 50/50?

On an early summer morning flight from Ft. Lauderdale, a few minutes after takeoff as the plane began to level off, I grabbed my iPhone from the seat pocket in front of me to connect to the airplane’s Wi-Fi. An advertisement appeared on my screen, one I was forced to watch before accessing the internet. The ad was for an organization called the Center for U.S. Voter Abroad Turnaround Project, targeting Americans living in Canada who wanted to vote in the U.S. election. Turnaround project? What exactly were they turning around? I immediately thought of the artificial militia, Patriot Front—it’s right there in the name; it’s a front.

Nonetheless, based on my experience in politics, both working on campaigns and running my own as a federal candidate, this appears to be another textbook example of an NGO or political proxy seemingly trying to influence the U.S. election, despite giving the impression of being non-partisan in nature. The implied goal is to recruit U.S. citizens living abroad to vote in the 2024 election through VoteAbroad.org. At least, this is what it appears to be on the surface.

Who Is Behind the Fortification?

The About Us section of the website includes their advisory board and a mission statement that reads: “The Center for U.S. Voters Abroad Turnout Project believes every overseas vote matters—including yours. If U.S. voters abroad formed a state, they would rank larger than 15 states, falling between Kansas and New Mexico in population size. However, in 2020, less than 8% of overseas U.S. voters cast their ballots, according to federal estimates. Our mission is to change that.

The Center for U.S. Voter Abroad Turnaround Project does not have a government URL, nor does it have any affiliation with the U.S. government.

It is clearly not a government entity, but rather an NGO or private organization seemingly attempting to influence voters. This feels similar to the manipulation we see in Canadian elections, where liberal-funded organizations, through political money laundering, create fake groups around an issue, only to disappear after the election. These organizations violate Canadian law—and likely U.S. law as well—yet remain unpunished due to their ties to political parties and strategic management firms.

Hollywood Involvement

What concerned me was how the ad kept reappearing every 30 minutes. It seemed like typical persuasion through repetition and even I, not eligible to vote in the US, was tempted to fill out the form just for fun. This clearly was a sophisticated campaign with experts in behaviour economics behind it.

A few months later, I saw the same organization advertised on Instagram, now with videos featuring Hollywood celebrities known for their support of the Democratic Party. My immediate reaction was: Who’s paying for this? Who’s behind this organization? As the 2024 U.S. election draws closer, I now regularly see ads for this group featuring celebrities like Conan O’Brien and Julia Louis-Dreyfus, both known for supporting the Democratic Party. How much does it cost to get someone like them to appear in an ad for this faceless, nameless organization? It’s starting to smell like a slick operation, masquerading as non-partisan but clearly aiming to influence the U.S. election—like George Clooney and Brad Pitt planning how and when they’re going to break into the vault and raid the casino.

Who is on the board?

Cristóbal Alex, a former deputy White House secretary in the Joe Biden administration, Silicon Valley investor Ari Steinberg, who invested in Airbnb and Facebook, and Anna Galland, a former Executive Director at the radical left Political Action Committee MoveOn.org—are listed as advisory board members. Are we to believe that such a bias group is merely helping with outreach in the 2024 election in a fair and honest way? Or is this exactly what it seems on the surface: another subversion strategy to distort election results. Are they building a list of absentee ballots that could violate data trends to the point where the results are mathematically impossible? Will the bellwether states, which have accurately predicted every U.S. election in modern history except for 2020, fail a second time?

I’m not saying these individuals shouldn’t be allowed to encourage Americans to vote, regardless of political persuasion. In fact, I think more people should follow their example. However, given the data irregularities from the 2020 election and the fact that 100% of this organization’s advisory board are Democrats, with links to one of the largest Democratic political action committees, the optics are terrible for people who are sceptical. If Rusty tells Danny they need a Boesky, a Jim Brown, a Miss Daisy, two Jethros, a Leon Spinks, and the biggest Ella Fitzgerald ever, it might just be a political Ocean’s 11 heist.

50/50 = 100%?

We often hear in the media that elections are too close to call, with Americans supposedly split 50/50, making the outcome a nail-biter every time no matter what. Yet somehow, in several examples from 2020 now in court records, large batches of mail-in ballots managed to vote 100% in favour of the Democratic candidate, a forgotten man named Joe Biden. 100%! do you know what it means to get 70% of the vote let alone 100%? These are numbers even Saddam Hussein, a ruthless dictator who murdered, jailed and tortured his own citizens into compliance, couldn’t achieve—he only managed 96%. The idea of 100% is a mathematical impossibility, especially when the legacy media constantly tries to convince the public it’s a 50/50 split. This is such a clear indication of fraud to anyone who has ever run a campaign or understands basic data analysis or grade two mathematics. Only those blinded by political bias, wearing the jersey of their favourite political team, remain sufficiently brainwashed not to see it.

In a recent livestream, Scott Adams discussed this trend. He pointed out that Democrats, presumably through this and other digital mail-in ballot harvesting operations, are aiming to secure 9 million votes from phantom Americans living outside the U.S. or overseas in the 2024 election. As Adams explains, and Julia Louis-Dreyfus confirmed in her promo video, under 3 million Americans live outside the US. How can democrat strategists claim they are trying to register 9 million Americans living abroad? Where is the shortage of 6.5 million votes coming from? The Center for U.S. Voter Abroad Turnaround Project?

Why Does the US Use Voting Machines Anyway?

Adams also mentioned other irregularities, covered in a Gateway Pundit article, that have been discovered since the 2020 election—an election many of us suspected was fraudulent. I know this upsets some people, but in Canada, we are well aware of the issues with various voting machines used to rig party nominations, whether intentionally or accidentally. These digital irregularities are unprovable, which some suspect is the reason voting machines are used in internal party nominations. It’s frustrating, especially when there are alternatives, like running an election on a verifiable and public pseudo-anonymous blockchain—whether it’s Bitcoin or a separate chain specifically designed for election integrity. One thing is certain: every computer engineer on the planet knows voting machines should never be used, as computer scientist-turned-YouTuber Tom Scott explained many years ago in his video on the subject.

As embarrassed as we are in Canada by Prime Minister Blackface’s antics, we still use paper ballots, pencils, and human vote counting in our general elections. While our political parties and internal nominations may be suspect, at least our general elections are clean. We can speculate endlessly about what did or didn’t happen in the 2020 U.S. election but I think we are all concerned about the future? What will be the impact on the 2024 US election by the Center for U.S. Voter Abroad Turnaround Project, with a budget large enough to hire Hollywood celebrities for propaganda purposes? Are people so naive that they cannot see how suspicious this looks, or is it something worse? Is it possible they simply do not care.

Order Now!
Honking For Freedom – The Trucker Convoy That Gave Us Hope HonkingForFreedom.com

Twitter | Locals | Rumble | Instagram
www.BenjaminjDichter.com

Comments are closed.